User research is often described as a universal practice: talk to users, test solutions, and extract insights that lead to better products. In industrial and safety-critical environments, this principle still holds true, but the conditions are fundamentally different. At Intunio, we have worked with industrial products and systems where user experience is not primarily about convenience or preference, but about safety, reliability, and trust. In these contexts, poor decisions can have consequences far beyond the interface itself. This places different demands on how user research is conducted, interpreted, and applied.
Tobias Rydenhag
Head of Design

In industrial systems, users are rarely separated from their context. Operators, technicians, and installers work in environments shaped by:
This means user behavior cannot be understood by studying the interface alone.
In many cases, success is determined not by how something looks, but by:
User research in industrial contexts therefore needs to start with an understanding of the work situation, not the solution.
Many established UX methods originate from consumer products:
Industrial systems often represent the opposite:
As a result, interviews and lab testing alone are rarely sufficient.
Users can often explain what they do, but not always why certain actions are critical, stressful, or difficult. To understand that, research must include observation, workflow analysis, and a deeper understanding of real-world decision-making.
In industrial projects, we repeatedly see that the most valuable insights emerge in the gap between what people say and what they actually do.
This can include:
These insights rarely surface in internal reviews or specifications, yet they have a direct impact on both usability and safety.
Effective industrial user research therefore relies on a combination of:
A common misconception is that good UX always means simplification. In industrial systems, this is often the wrong approach.
Users are typically experts. Systems contain many parameters, settings, and dependencies for valid reasons. The challenge is not to remove complexity, but to:
User research helps distinguish necessary complexity from complexity caused by legacy systems, technical constraints, or internal compromises.
In industrial environments, accessibility often aligns directly with quality and robustness.
High readability, clear contrast, and predictable interaction patterns are not only about inclusion — they are essential for:
User research in industrial contexts must therefore also account for physical and cognitive conditions, ensuring that designs work in real environments, not just controlled test scenarios.
Industrial products are often developed over long life cycles. Decisions made early may remain in place for many years and influence multiple generations of products.
In this context, user research becomes a way to:
It is less about quick insights and more about creating a shared understanding of users’ work, guiding design, engineering, and product strategy alike.
At its core, user research in industrial and safety-critical environments is not primarily about methods — it is about understanding.
Understanding:
When that understanding is in place, UX can help create systems that are not only technically advanced, but also understandable, reliable, and safe to use. Even under the most demanding conditions.