Intunio runs WCAG audits and EAA assessments for websites and apps. We deliver prioritised reports, action plans, and ready-made design proposals in Figma.
Intunio is a design and development studio based in Gothenburg. We carry out WCAG audits, accessibility reviews, and EAA assessments against the European Accessibility Act. You receive a prioritised report, an action plan with effort estimates, and ready-to-implement design proposals in Figma that your developers can apply directly.
Looking for our broader perspective on accessibility? See the accessibility service.

WCAG review of websites, apps, or a specific product across all levels (A, AA, AAA)
EAA assessment against the requirements of the European Accessibility Act
Prioritised report with issues grouped by critical, high, medium, low
Action plan with effort estimates per item, separating systemic issues from individual fixes
Design proposals in Figma for the most important fixes — you don't only learn what's wrong, you see how to solve it
Review of the design system foundation when one exists; that's where the root causes usually sit
The industries we work with most in audit engagements are industrial, medtech, SaaS, and e-commerce — all subject to EAA requirements, each with different priorities for what becomes critical.
The European Accessibility Act (EAA) came into force on 28 June 2025. In Sweden it's implemented through Lag (2023:254) on the accessibility of certain products and services, with the Post and Telecom Authority (PTS) as the supervisory body.
For new digital products and services, the requirements already apply. Services that existed before 28 June 2025 have a transition period until 28 June 2030, but only if the service isn't substantially changed during that period. In practice, many organisations fall within scope as soon as they make a major update.
The consequences of not meeting the requirements are concrete: complaints from users, enforcement decisions from PTS, and ultimately fines. The phase we're in now is one of intensified supervision, with the first cases being reviewed.
The scope depends on the product and the need. Three common engagements:
WCAG quick review (approximately 40 hours, around 1 week): an initial assessment of a website or app. The result is a shortlist of the most pressing issues and a rough effort estimate for fixes. A good starting point when the situation needs to be mapped out quickly.
WCAG or EAA audit + design proposals (80–160 hours, 2–4 weeks): a full review against the requirements plus concrete design solutions in Figma for the most important fixes. Delivered as a prioritised report, an action plan with effort estimates per item, and ready design mockups that your developers can implement directly.
Audit + implementation (from 160 hours and up, from 4 weeks): we take end-to-end responsibility and build the fixes together with you, both design and code. Suitable when you want Intunio to deliver the fixes all the way into the product.
For clients who are already engaged in design system work, we build accessibility into the foundation rather than running a separate audit. That's often the most cost-effective path to long-term accessibility.
We apply a discounted hourly rate for monthly agreements: you pay the month's estimated cost in advance, and get a price you can plan around. No commitment beyond the current month, no minimum term. The model applies to all our services, not just audits.
We use Claude, Cursor, and Codex to make all our work more efficient — in review work, design work, and code. It's our expertise working faster.
Three typical situations where an audit becomes relevant:
Someone in the organisation raises the EAA, a user reports that the product doesn't work with a screen reader, or a review shows that the situation needs to be mapped. An audit then provides the starting point.
Maybe because a customer requires it, maybe because you want to reach a broader user group. A focused audit with an action plan is the right tool.
An audit of the system itself, not only the products that use it, gives a stronger foundation to build on.
In all three cases the starting point is the same: accessibility isn't an add-on. It's a sign that quality has been part of the work all along.
Intunio is based in Gothenburg, on Korsgatan 24 in the city centre. For clients in Gothenburg and Western Sweden, proximity is an important part of the collaboration. Workshops, check-ins, and informal meetings often happen on-site at your place or ours, which gives a kind of continuity that's hard to achieve with fully remote teams. It also matches our model: we become an extension of your team over time, not an external supplier.
Yes. Intunio has had continuous engagements with clients in Sweden, Europe, and North America throughout our history. We have particular experience with clients in the US and Canada, so working across time zones is part of our normal rhythm. WCAG audits, EAA assessments, action plans, and design system work are mostly carried out remotely, complemented by workshops and on-site reviews where it's valuable.
In practice they're the same thing. "WCAG audit" is the established term in tech and UX, while "accessibility review" is the broader term often used in the public sector and by regulatory bodies. Both refer to the same work: a structured assessment of a website or app against WCAG guidelines and EAA requirements, with an action plan as the deliverable.
WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) are the technical guidelines for how web and app interfaces should be made accessible. EAA (European Accessibility Act) is the EU legislation that determines which organisations must meet the requirements, and from when. EAA effectively references WCAG as the standard to meet. In short: WCAG is the how, EAA is the when and why.
Companies selling digital products or services to consumers within the EU. This includes e-commerce, banking, ticketing, e-books, and a range of other categories. Microenterprises (under 10 employees and under €2M turnover) providing services are exempt, but not from the product requirements. When you're unsure, we run a first assessment to clarify whether you're in scope and where you stand.
A quick review takes around one week. A full structured audit takes 2–4 weeks depending on the size of the product and how many flows and page types need to be reviewed. Complex industrial or embedded systems take longer, since the context and use situation need to be evaluated alongside the technology.
A prioritised list of issues (critical, high, medium, low), an effort estimate per item, and a separation between what's a systemic problem (best fixed in the design system foundation) and what's an individual fix. The plan also shows which fixes require design and which require development, so you can plan resourcing.
Both. Some clients want audit + action plan and drive implementation themselves. Others want us to design and build the fixes. The most common engagement is somewhere in between: we take responsibility for the design system's accessibility foundation and support the development team with guidelines and review during implementation.
With a monthly agreement, the hourly rate is 995 SEK (our discounted rate). You pay the month's estimated cost in advance and get a price you can plan around. No commitment beyond the current month — it runs month by month. Multiply the hours in the packages above by 995 SEK for a rough budget; we provide an exact quote once scope is confirmed. The model applies to all our services, not just accessibility.
AI tools are included in the rate. We use Claude, Cursor, and Codex where they make the work better — in audit work as well as in design and development. That means you get faster delivery at the same price. It also means quality is built on long experience of combining AI with expert knowledge, not on trying to solve accessibility with a chat prompt.
Intunio is a design and development studio based in Gothenburg. We help companies create digital products, apps, and systems that are easy to use and built to last.
Inom WCAG-audit och EAA-bedömning kartlägger vi var en produkt står mot tillgänglighetsdirektivet, med prioriterad rapport, tidsuppskattningar och designförslag i Figma som går rakt in i utvecklarens arbete.






































Berätta var ni står, om det är en webbsida, app eller produkt som ska bedömas, så hör vi av oss med ett förslag på paket och nästa steg.